Order Only: Muggleborns
Sep. 29th, 2013 10:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Professor McGonagall gave me the names in the book. There are nine--that's rather a lot since July, isn't it?
Anyway, here they are:
Dorothy Harris, New London
Emma Jenkins, Dartford, Kent
Richard Marshall, Hartlepool, Durham
George McCalman, Armitage, Staffordshire
Ifan Powys, Llanfyllin, Powys
Curtis Reinman, Ely, Cambridgeshire
Gavenia Selvaratnam, Galashiels, Scottish Borders
Arthur Tanisbee, New London
Anita Williams, Manchester
Something must have upset her about this, too--because she didn't want to post about it herself. I think it's because of the Tansibee baby. Arthur. I remembered that Mr Weasley had to bring Jane Tanisbee back to the camps because she'd been assaulted by the son of the family she worked for. But then I thought, isn't that impossible, for it to be the same Tanisbee? Because Mr Weasley made it so she wouldn't have any babies for ten years and--well, it's only been six years.
Still. It doesn't seem like it'd be coincidence, the baby being named Arthur like that. Does it?
Anyway, here they are:
Dorothy Harris, New London
Emma Jenkins, Dartford, Kent
Richard Marshall, Hartlepool, Durham
George McCalman, Armitage, Staffordshire
Ifan Powys, Llanfyllin, Powys
Curtis Reinman, Ely, Cambridgeshire
Gavenia Selvaratnam, Galashiels, Scottish Borders
Arthur Tanisbee, New London
Anita Williams, Manchester
Something must have upset her about this, too--because she didn't want to post about it herself. I think it's because of the Tansibee baby. Arthur. I remembered that Mr Weasley had to bring Jane Tanisbee back to the camps because she'd been assaulted by the son of the family she worked for. But then I thought, isn't that impossible, for it to be the same Tanisbee? Because Mr Weasley made it so she wouldn't have any babies for ten years and--well, it's only been six years.
Still. It doesn't seem like it'd be coincidence, the baby being named Arthur like that. Does it?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:33 am (UTC)You didn't ever find the last one, did you? Alice Sinclair?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:37 am (UTC)Oh, half a moment! Harris. Wasn't there a Harris in the past, too?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:39 am (UTC)Somewhere. I can't remember who mentioned a Harris. Maybe it was Mr Weasley?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:40 am (UTC)She and Laurel were the other choices besides Ellie - the ones Davidson's people recommended we try to rescue.
And they're about the same age as Jane Tanisbee, too.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:42 am (UTC)I have a guess of what might be going on but it's pretty horrid.
Hermione are you thinking what I'm thinking?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:47 am (UTC)Or someone wants them to be having babies. Those are the only things I can think that would explain it.
Only I think if a muggleborn brothel had opened in New London, someone would have mentioned it. I mean, in certain circles. The Council wouldn't care for that sort of thing at all. And whoever did it would have had to bribe the camps pretty heavily to get the muggleborns out for that sort of thing.
But it's possible. They told Mrs Stretton there was a shortage, didn't they?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:57 am (UTC)In New London.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:51 am (UTC)That's less horrid thanThe thing is they'd have used contraceptive charms, surely. Or potions or something. Because they could get in loads of trouble and babies are a good way to get noticed what's going on, you know?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:53 am (UTC)I think the other thing is more likely. But I'm not sure why. Unless they want to have a whole load of
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:54 am (UTC)Yes, that's much more horrid.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:58 am (UTC)You're thinking about Strangeweale, and the device he was going to use on Arista Selwyn.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:59 am (UTC)There's nobody in the Protectorate more 'expendable' than a baby born to a muggleborn girl.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:36 pm (UTC)Oh, we can't abandon Arthur's namesake to that foul machine! Or any of the rest of them!
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:59 am (UTC)Harry destroyed it. But he must have been able to rebuild it.
But that also means he must have been planning something for a long time, since last winter.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:00 am (UTC)And not that many muggleborns are born, usually. In fact -- well he wouldn't know ANY had been born in the last few years, right? I mean how long has it been since the Order missed one?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:01 am (UTC)They wanted Arista and Hector because they were so young. So babies would be even better, wouldn't they? Or maybe he has to wait until they manifest their magic.
Oh my goodness! Do you think they have another way to find them besides the book? Other muggleborn babies, I mean? Maybe not since they're breeding them especially.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:05 am (UTC)This would certainly explain them.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:08 am (UTC)But we'd better get on these others as soon as possible, just in case.
Oh, bugger. If Minerva has already altered the book, we might be in trouble.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:16 am (UTC)Minerva, any way to add those names back in?
Including Sinclair?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:19 am (UTC)I'd like a full report on the possible location of the machine, anything you can recall about its properties, and any details about the layout of the Department of Mysteries from those who were there this summer.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:23 am (UTC)You might also talk to Arista about it. And see what she remembers.
I can sketch out what I remember of the layout, that would be easier than trying to describe it in the journal. It would probably be best if I did that in either the Hospital Wing or Mr Snape's office so I could give it straight to an Order member when I was done.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:26 am (UTC)Maybe we could all meet at Mr Snape's office and work on it together or something?
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:34 am (UTC)I have no doubt it will be very painful for her to revisit.
I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2013-09-30 03:43 am (UTC)Yes, yes, Arista is ten and we're practically of age. I KNOW. But she's also the only one Strangeweale talked to.
Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2013-09-30 03:56 am (UTC)Re: I Solemnly Swear That I Am Up To No Good
Date: 2013-09-30 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 04:13 am (UTC)I think she trusts him more than she does me.
And it's often easier to share something painful with someone who was there for it in the first place.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 03:26 am (UTC)Sally-Anne's right, we should write reports and give them directly to Madam Pomfrey, Mr Snape, Professor Sprout, Professor Brutka, or Headmistress McGonagall.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:42 am (UTC)Tried your suggestion to diffuse the heat of the cauldron this afternoon. It worked a treat. You're brilliant, kiddo.
Tell his greasiness I'm sending up a sample to test.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:53 am (UTC)But someone would have had to reverse it.
no subject
Date: 2013-09-30 02:55 am (UTC)Someone probably did.
It also explains why you can't find Alise Sinclair.
Private message to Padfoot
Date: 2013-09-30 03:04 am (UTC)Forget capital letters. There isn't enough profanity in the English language to cover this situation.
Re: Private message to Padfoot
Date: 2013-09-30 03:13 am (UTC)Beyond that, though, there's a potential concern here: If they already have Sinclair, Harris, Tanisbee - we can't leave them out of the false book.
But we've no way to know if they know about the others. And if we leave them out, we risk exposing the book. But if we don't, then we hand them over the next time Lucius bloody Malfoy sticks his nose in it. Either way, it could blow Minerva's cover wide open - and potentially the whole lot of them at Hogwarts.
Bugger all.
Re: Private message to Padfoot
Date: 2013-09-30 03:19 am (UTC)Has anyone other than Lucius Malfoy ever looked at the book?
Re: Private message to Padfoot
Date: 2013-09-30 03:23 am (UTC)So far as I know, he looks at it because he sits on the Board of Governors and it's convenient for him to look at it. But it doesn't really matter who looks and who doesn't. Voldemort knows about it, so he could easily send someone else if he had a mind to do.
I mean, it's not like Bill could casually ask his boss if he knows there's a book that inscribes the names of all magical children, can he? As soon as he mentions it, even if Mulciber didn't know before well - he would certainly know it thereafter!